magic: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents legend
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.57
, science
Weight: 0.56
Siblings miracle
Weight: 0.33
, genius
Weight: 0.33
, trick
Weight: 0.33
, joy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(magic, be related)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(word, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(magic, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(word, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(word, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(magic, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(word, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(magic, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(magic, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(magic, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(magic, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(word, be related)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(word, be related)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(magic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)