magic: was used in 1600s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents legend
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.57
, science
Weight: 0.56
Siblings miracle
Weight: 0.33
, genius
Weight: 0.33
, trick
Weight: 0.33
, joy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in 1600s 1.00
was invented 0.79
be in ds3 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was used in 1600s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(science, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(magic, was used in 1600s)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(magic, be in ds3)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(magic, be in ds3)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(magic, be in ds3)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(magic, was invented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(magic, be in ds3)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(magic, was invented)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(magic, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magic, was used in 1600s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(magic, was used in 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)