magnesium oxide: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents magnesium hydroxide
Weight: 0.85
, mineral
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.72
, magnesium
Weight: 0.66
Siblings magnesium carbonate
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.41
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.40
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.39
, hydrogen sulfide
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is quality 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(iron oxide, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(iron oxide, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron oxide, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron oxide, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium hydroxide, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(magnesium hydroxide, is quality)