magnesium oxide: have higher melting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents magnesium hydroxide
Weight: 0.85
, mineral
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.72
, magnesium
Weight: 0.66
Siblings magnesium carbonate
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.41
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.40
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.39
, hydrogen sulfide
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have higher melting 1.00
have high melting 0.95
have melting 0.93
have high melting point 0.90
have melting point 0.88
have higher melting point than sulfur dioxide 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen sulfide, have melting point)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have melting point)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hydrogen sulfide, have melting point)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrogen sulfide, have melting point)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have melting point)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, have melting point)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have high melting point)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have high melting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, have high melting point)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have high melting point)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, have melting point)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have melting point)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have melting point)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have high melting)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, have high melting)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have melting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have melting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, have melting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have melting point)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have high melting point)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have high melting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have melting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting point than sulfur dioxide)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting point than sulfur dioxide)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting point than sulfur dioxide)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting point than sulfur dioxide)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hydrogen sulfide, have melting point)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, have higher melting)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, have melting point)