magnetic field: converge at poles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dipole
Weight: 0.61
, coil
Weight: 0.59
, magnet
Weight: 0.58
, football field
Weight: 0.37
, baseball field
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
converge at poles 1.00
get poles 0.85
have poles 0.84
has north poles 0.83
has poles 0.83
be stronger at poles 0.82
have 2 poles 0.82
have three poles 0.82
be with two poles stronger than magnets with one pole 0.79
be attracted to north pole 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetic field, converge at poles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(field, converge at poles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(field, converge at poles)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(magnet, has north poles)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(magnet, get poles)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(magnet, have poles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(magnet, have poles)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(magnet, have poles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(magnet, has north poles)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(magnet, has north poles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(magnet, get poles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(magnet, get poles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(magnetic field, converge at poles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetic field, converge at poles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(field, converge at poles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(magnet, have poles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(magnet, get poles)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(magnet, has north poles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(magnetic field, converge at poles)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(field, converge at poles)