magnetic tape: be used with pcs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.67
, medium
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.59
Siblings videotape
Weight: 0.54
, dat
Weight: 0.47
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.38
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used with pcs 1.00
be different from pcs 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be different from pcs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(device, be different from pcs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tape, be used with pcs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(device, be different from pcs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, be used with pcs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(device, be different from pcs)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tape, be used with pcs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(device, be different from pcs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tape, be used with pcs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(magnetic tape, be used with pcs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(device, be different from pcs)