magnetic tape: is access medium

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.67
, medium
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.59
Siblings videotape
Weight: 0.54
, dat
Weight: 0.47
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.38
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is access medium 1.00
is sequential access medium 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tape, is sequential access medium)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tape, is access medium)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tape, is sequential access medium)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tape, is sequential access medium)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tape, is access medium)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tape, is sequential access medium)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(magnetic tape, is access medium)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(magnetic tape, is sequential access medium)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is sequential access medium)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(magnetic tape, is sequential access medium)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, is sequential access medium)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tape, is access medium)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape, is sequential access medium)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tape, is access medium)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(magnetic tape, is access medium)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape, is sequential access medium)