magnetism: be considered property applied

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings intellect
Weight: 0.33
, warmth
Weight: 0.33
, chemistry
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, hardness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered property applied 1.00
be considered property 0.91
be considered property applied to minerals 0.91
be considered property applied to certain minerals 0.90
is property 0.83
is physical property 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(characteristic, is property)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(characteristic, is physical property)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(characteristic, is physical property)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(characteristic, is property)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, is property)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, is physical property)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hardness, is property)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hardness, is physical property)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(characteristic, is property)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(characteristic, is physical property)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hardness, is property)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hardness, is property)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hardness, is physical property)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hardness, is physical property)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(magnetism, is physical property)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(magnetism, is physical property)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(magnetism, is physical property)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, is property)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(magnetism, is property)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, is physical property)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(magnetism, is property)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(magnetism, is property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(characteristic, is property)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(characteristic, is physical property)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hardness, is property)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hardness, is physical property)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(characteristic, is physical property)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(characteristic, is property)