magnetism: identifying minerals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings intellect
Weight: 0.33
, warmth
Weight: 0.33
, chemistry
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, hardness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
identifying minerals 1.00
be considered property applied to certain minerals 0.82
be considered property applied to minerals 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hardness, identifying minerals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hardness, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hardness, identifying minerals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(magnetism, identifying minerals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied to minerals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, be considered property applied to certain minerals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, identifying minerals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(magnetism, identifying minerals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(magnetism, identifying minerals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hardness, identifying minerals)