magnitude: affect casualty rate of earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scale
Weight: 0.33
, probability
Weight: 0.32
, intensity
Weight: 0.32
, amplitude
Weight: 0.32
, frequency
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect casualty rate of earthquakes 1.00
affect casualty rate 0.92
be better measure of strength of earthquakes 0.80
affect earthquake 0.80
has state earthquake 0.76
affect rate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(intensity, has state earthquake)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(intensity, affect rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect rate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(intensity, has state earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(intensity, has state earthquake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(intensity, affect rate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(intensity, has state earthquake)