magnitude: affect economic impact

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scale
Weight: 0.33
, probability
Weight: 0.32
, intensity
Weight: 0.32
, amplitude
Weight: 0.32
, frequency
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economic impact 1.00
affect impact 0.93
have impact 0.91
have impact on development 0.89
affect effect 0.86
affect business 0.84
affect potential 0.82
be in wealth impact on way 0.82
affect change 0.81
effect business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(difference, be in wealth impact on way)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, effect business)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, effect business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(difference, be in wealth impact on way)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in wealth impact on way)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, effect business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect potential)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect effect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(difference, be in wealth impact on way)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, effect business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(intensity, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect effect)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(intensity, affect potential)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect potential)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect impact)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(factor, effect business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(difference, be in wealth impact on way)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(intensity, affect effect)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intensity, affect potential)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(factor, effect business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(difference, be in wealth impact on way)