magnitude: affect impact

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scale
Weight: 0.33
, probability
Weight: 0.32
, intensity
Weight: 0.32
, amplitude
Weight: 0.32
, frequency
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect impact 1.00
have impact 0.96
affect economic impact 0.93
affect effect 0.92
have impact on development 0.89
affect change 0.86
affect result 0.85
affect potential 0.85
effect result of experinment 0.82
effect result 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(variable, affect result)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(variable, effect result of experinment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(variable, effect result)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(variable, affect result)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(variable, effect result)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(variable, effect result of experinment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(variable, effect result of experinment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(variable, effect result)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(variable, affect result)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect potential)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(intensity, affect effect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(variable, affect result)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(variable, effect result of experinment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(variable, effect result)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(intensity, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect effect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(intensity, affect potential)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(intensity, affect potential)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect impact)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect economic impact)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect economic impact)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect impact)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(variable, affect result)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(variable, effect result)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(variable, effect result of experinment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(intensity, affect effect)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intensity, affect potential)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(variable, affect result)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(variable, effect result)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(magnitude, affect impact)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(variable, effect result of experinment)