magnitude: be better measure of strength of earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scale
Weight: 0.33
, probability
Weight: 0.32
, intensity
Weight: 0.32
, amplitude
Weight: 0.32
, frequency
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better measure of strength of earthquakes 1.00
affect earthquake 0.82
affect casualty rate of earthquakes 0.80
has state earthquake 0.80
be impossible 10 earthquake 0.79
measure 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(intensity, has state earthquake)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(frequency, measure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(frequency, measure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(frequency, measure)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(intensity, has state earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(intensity, has state earthquake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(magnitude, be impossible 10 earthquake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be impossible 10 earthquake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(magnitude, be impossible 10 earthquake)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(magnitude, be impossible 10 earthquake)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(magnitude, affect earthquake)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, affect casualty rate of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(frequency, measure)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, be better measure of strength of earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(intensity, has state earthquake)