magnitude: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	parameter Weight: 0.60 , variable Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59 , difference Weight: 0.53
Siblings	scale Weight: 0.33 , probability Weight: 0.32 , intensity Weight: 0.32 , amplitude Weight: 0.32 , frequency Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality cost	0.82
actually can improve business	0.78
sound good	0.78
has consistency density	0.77
has quality questions	0.76
sound good together	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(difference, actually can improve business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(difference, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(difference, actually can improve business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(difference, actually can improve business)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(scale, sound good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(frequency, sound good together)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(probability, has consistency density)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(probability, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(magnitude, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(magnitude, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(difference, actually can improve business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(magnitude, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(magnitude, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(probability, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(probability, has quality questions)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(frequency, sound good together) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(frequency, sound good together)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(probability, has consistency density) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(probability, has consistency density)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(scale, sound good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(scale, sound good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(magnitude, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(difference, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(difference, actually can improve business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(frequency, sound good together)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(probability, has quality questions)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(probability, has consistency density)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(scale, sound good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(difference, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(difference, actually can improve business)