magpie: attack own young

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
, scavenger
Weight: 0.46
, creature
Weight: 0.36
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack own young 1.00
attack young 0.95
attack 0.85
kill young 0.81
kill own 0.80
abandon young 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(owl, attack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(owl, attack)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(owl, attack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(magpie, attack own young)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack young)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack young)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(magpie, attack young)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(magpie, attack young)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(magpie, attack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(magpie, attack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack own young)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(magpie, attack own young)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack own young)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(owl, attack)