mailman: be at front door

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents people
Weight: 0.46
, service
Weight: 0.44
, man
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.43
, assassin
Weight: 0.41
Siblings postman
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at front door 1.00
force open door 0.85
pull at door 0.85
enter door 0.84
see date to her door 0.82
wedge door open 0.81
enter doorway 0.78
be front of microphone 0.77
be outside or inside 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(man, enter door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mailman, be at front door)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be outside or inside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mailman, be at front door)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be outside or inside)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(man, enter door)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(man, enter door)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(thing, be outside or inside)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at front door)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(policeman, force open door)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(man, enter door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mailman, be at front door)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be outside or inside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mailman, be at front door)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(policeman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at front door)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(policeman, force open door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(policeman, force open door)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mailman, be at front door)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mailman, be at front door)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mailman, be at front door)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mailman, be at front door)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mailman, be at front door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(thing, be outside or inside)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(man, enter door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(policeman, be at front door)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policeman, force open door)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(thing, be outside or inside)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(mailman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(man, enter door)