main course: be at dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, dish
Weight: 0.55
, dessert
Weight: 0.52
, time
Weight: 0.52
Siblings golf course
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.32
, big brother
Weight: 0.32
, sole
Weight: 0.32
, obstacle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dinner 1.00
be eat after dinner 0.92
follow dinner 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(main course, be at dinner)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(main course, be at dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dessert, follow dinner)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(main course, be at dinner)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(main course, be at dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(main course, be at dinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(main course, be at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, follow dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, follow dinner)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(main course, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)