maine: have high voter turnout

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.67
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings vermont
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high voter turnout 1.00
have voter turnout 0.99
split electoral votes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(maine, have high voter turnout)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, have voter turnout)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(maine, have voter turnout)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maine, have voter turnout)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, split electoral votes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, have voter turnout)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(maine, split electoral votes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(maine, split electoral votes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(maine, split electoral votes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(maine, have high voter turnout)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(maine, have high voter turnout)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(maine, have high voter turnout)