maintenance: be in middle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in middle 1.00
be in middle of day 0.93
be in middle of day bad 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(watering, be in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(watering, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(watering, be in middle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(watering, be in middle of day)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(watering, be in middle of day bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(watering, be in middle of day bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maintenance, be in middle)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle of day)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maintenance, be in middle of day)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be in middle of day)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maintenance, be in middle of day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(maintenance, be in middle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(watering, be in middle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(watering, be in middle of day bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be in middle)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(watering, be in middle of day)