makeup: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, accessory
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings face powder
Weight: 0.62
, eyeliner
Weight: 0.55
, rouge
Weight: 0.40
, hair color
Weight: 0.35
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be bad for environment 0.80
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(makeup, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hair color, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(makeup, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pubic hair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(eyeliner, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(eyeliner, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hair color, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hair color, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(makeup, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(makeup, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(makeup, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(makeup, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(makeup, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(makeup, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(makeup, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(makeup, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(makeup, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(makeup, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(makeup, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(makeup, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(makeup, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(makeup, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(makeup, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(makeup, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(eyeliner, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hair color, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(makeup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)