making: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, form
Weight: 0.53
, matter
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.51
Siblings make
Weight: 0.35
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31
, turning
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
is up bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(make, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(giving, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(make, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(make, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(making, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(making, is up bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(making, is up bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(making, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(making, is up bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(making, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(making, is up bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(making, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(making, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(making, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(making, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(making, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(make, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(making, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)