making: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, form
Weight: 0.53
, matter
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.51
Siblings make
Weight: 0.35
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31
, turning
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
is physical change 0.84
is quality 0.84
be example of physical change 0.79
is chemical change 0.76
be chemical change 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(make, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(make, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(make, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(make, is quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(make, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(make, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(making, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(making, is physical change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(making, is physical change)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(making, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(making, is physical change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(making, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(making, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(making, be example of physical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(making, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(making, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(making, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(making, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(making, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(making, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(making, is chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(making, be chemical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(making, be example of physical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(making, be example of physical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(making, be example of physical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(making, is chemical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(making, is chemical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(making, be chemical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(making, be chemical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(making, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(making, be chemical change)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(making, is physical change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(making, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(making, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(make, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(make, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(making, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)