malaria: be barrier to economic development in poor countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, pathogen
Weight: 0.65
, sickness
Weight: 0.65
, killer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings thalassemia
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, measles
Weight: 0.38
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.38
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to economic development in poor countries 1.00
be barrier to development 0.88
occur predominantly in poorer countries 0.79
be more common in developing countries 0.78
occur predominantly in developing countries 0.78
is economic issue 0.78
be worse in developing world 0.76
be more common in countries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be more common in developing countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be more common in developing countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be more common in developing countries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be barrier to development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(malaria, be barrier to development)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(malaria, be barrier to development)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(malaria, be barrier to development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be barrier to economic development in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be more common in developing countries)