malaria: be more prevalent in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.73
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, pathogen
Weight: 0.65
, sickness
Weight: 0.65
, killer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings thalassemia
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, measles
Weight: 0.38
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.38
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more prevalent in africa 1.00
be prevalent in africa 0.99
be endemic in africa 0.91
be common in africa 0.90
be common in africa south 0.88
occur in africa 0.88
be in africa 0.88
be problem in africa 0.87
be in africa problem 0.87
spread in africa 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(disease, be common in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(disease, be common in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(disease, be common in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be common in africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(disease, be common in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be common in africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be common in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(malaria, be prevalent in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(malaria, be in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malaria, be endemic in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(malaria, occur in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(malaria, be in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(malaria, be in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(malaria, be prevalent in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(malaria, be prevalent in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(malaria, spread in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(malaria, be common in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(malaria, occur in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(malaria, be endemic in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(malaria, spread in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(malaria, be problem in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(malaria, spread in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(malaria, occur in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malaria, be endemic in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(malaria, be common in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(malaria, be problem in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(malaria, be common in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(malaria, be problem in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, spread in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be problem in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be prevalent in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be common in africa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be endemic in africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(malaria, occur in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(disease, be common in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be common in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(malaria, be more prevalent in africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(disease, be common in africa)