male: be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents female
Weight: 0.65
, term
Weight: 0.50
, resident
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.49
Siblings black
Weight: 0.62
, sex ratio
Weight: 0.47
, hermaphrodite
Weight: 0.45
, lovebird
Weight: 0.37
, homosexual
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females 1.00
have sex-liked trait than females 0.90
be than females affected 0.86
have more developed traits as result of natural selection than females 0.86
be more likely than females have 0.83
be momre likely than females have 0.83
be less mature than females 0.82
be than females 0.82
be better than females 0.82
be more likely than females display 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(male, be less mature than females)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(male, have more developed traits as result of natural selection than females)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(male, be less mature than females)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(male, be less mature than females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(male, have more developed traits as result of natural selection than females)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(male, have more developed traits as result of natural selection than females)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(male, be less mature than females)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(male, have more developed traits as result of natural selection than females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(male, be affected by recessive sex-linked traits more than females)