mall: affect public market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect public market 1.00
affect market 0.93
be different from market area 0.82
survive in today 's market 0.80
affect commercial agriculture 0.77
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mall, affect public market)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(location, affect commercial agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mall, affect public market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(location, affect commercial agriculture)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(location, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(location, affect commercial agriculture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, survive in today 's market)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mall, affect public market)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(location, affect commercial agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mall, affect public market)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(convenience store, survive in today 's market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(convenience store, survive in today 's market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mall, affect public market)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mall, affect market)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mall, affect market)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mall, affect market)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mall, affect public market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(location, affect commercial agriculture)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(convenience store, survive in today 's market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(location, affect commercial agriculture)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(mall, affect public market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)