mall: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
be in london red 0.95
be in london closed 0.93
be in manhattan 0.79
is york 0.79
dallas tx 0.78
is houston 0.78
be expensive in seattle 0.78
is chicago 0.78
be expensive in mumbai 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in mumbai) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mall, be in london)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mall, be in london)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in mumbai)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in mumbai)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in seattle)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(department store, be in london)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(department store, is york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food store, is york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in mumbai) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(department store, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(department store, be in london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(department store, is york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(department store, is york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food store, is york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(food store, is york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mall, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london red)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london closed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(mall, be in london closed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london closed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mall, is houston)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chicago)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mall, be in london closed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mall, be in london red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be in london red)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mall, is houston)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mall, is chicago)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mall, is chicago)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mall, is houston)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, is chicago)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mall, is houston)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mall, be in london red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mall, be in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in mumbai)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(department store, is york)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(department store, be in london)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, is york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mall, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in mumbai)