mall: better looking people than other stores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
better looking people than other stores 1.00
is clothing stores 0.81
burn easier than others 0.77
be worse than area 51 0.76
get more expensive 0.75
look same 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(real estate, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(real estate, get more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(real estate, get more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(real estate, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mall, is clothing stores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mall, is clothing stores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mall, look same)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mall, is clothing stores)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mall, is clothing stores)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mall, look same)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mall, look same)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mall, look same)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate, get more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mall, better looking people than other stores)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(real estate, get more expensive)