mall: close consumption is rising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
close consumption is rising 1.00
have higher prices 0.80
have prices 0.77
be on decline 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have higher prices)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have prices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(convenience store, have prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(convenience store, have prices)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(convenience store, have higher prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(convenience store, have higher prices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mall, close consumption is rising)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mall, be on decline)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mall, be on decline)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mall, be on decline)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mall, be on decline)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mall, close consumption is rising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(convenience store, have prices)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mall, close consumption is rising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(convenience store, have higher prices)