malta: is developing country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.66
, island
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.56
, state
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.51
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.36
, bahrain
Weight: 0.36
, kosovo
Weight: 0.35
, ellis island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developing country 1.00
is developing 0.93
is developed country 0.90
is country 0.83
is good country 0.79
was important country to emopire 0.79
was important country to brithish emopire 0.79
is developed 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bahrain, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(kosovo, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(kosovo, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kosovo, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bahrain, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bahrain, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(zambia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zambia, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(malta, is developing country)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(malta, is developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(malta, is country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(malta, is developed country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(malta, is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(malta, is country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(malta, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(malta, is good country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(malta, is developed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(malta, is good country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(malta, is good country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(malta, is good country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(malta, is country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(kosovo, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bahrain, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(zambia, is country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)