malta: was popular in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.66
, island
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.56
, state
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.51
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.36
, bahrain
Weight: 0.36
, kosovo
Weight: 0.35
, ellis island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular in history 1.00
is famous 0.78
was important country to emopire 0.78
was important country to brithish emopire 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(new zealand, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(malta, was popular in history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bahrain, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ellis island, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(new zealand, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(malta, was popular in history)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ellis island, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ellis island, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(zambia, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(zambia, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bahrain, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bahrain, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(malta, was popular in history)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(malta, is famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(malta, is famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to emopire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(malta, is famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to brithish emopire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(malta, is famous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(malta, was important country to emopire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(malta, was popular in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new zealand, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bahrain, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ellis island, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(zambia, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(malta, was popular in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new zealand, is famous)