mammal: be fun

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.78
, blue whale
Weight: 0.76
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, dolphin
Weight: 0.75
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fun 1.00
be fun but big respondsibility 0.87
be useless but still enjoyable 0.77
be used to enjoy life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be fun)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, be used to enjoy life)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pet, be fun)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pet, be used to enjoy life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pet, be fun)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pet, be used to enjoy life)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be fun)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, be fun)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, be fun)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, be fun)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, be used to enjoy life)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, be fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mammal, be fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mammal, be fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, be fun)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pet, be used to enjoy life)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, be fun)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mammal, be fun)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pet, be used to enjoy life)