mammoth: be at alaska freeze dead

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at alaska freeze dead 1.00
be at alaska 0.85
be at grind in alaska 0.82
be dead 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be dead)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(dinosaur, be dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be dead)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at alaska)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at alaska)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaska freeze dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be dead)