mammoth: be at archeological site

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at archeological site 1.00
be at archeological museum 0.94
be at archeological dig 0.93
be at excavation 0.86
be at siberian site 0.80
be at paleontology dig 0.76
be at ancient siberia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at archeological museum)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at archeological dig)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological museum)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at excavation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at siberian site)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological dig)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at ancient siberia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at paleontology dig)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at archeological dig)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at siberian site)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at paleontology dig)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at excavation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological dig)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at paleontology dig)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at siberian site)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological museum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at archeological museum)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at paleontology dig)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at ancient siberia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at ancient siberia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at ancient siberia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian site)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at excavation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at excavation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at archeological site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mammoth, be at archeological site)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at archeological site)