mammoth: be at glacial ice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at glacial ice 1.00
be at ice 0.86
be at glacier 0.84
be at siberian ice 0.83
be at freeze glacier 0.83
be at siberian permafrost 0.79
be at freeze arctic tundra 0.79
be at tundra 0.77
be at alaskan tundra 0.77
be at siberian tundra 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian permafrost)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at alaskan tundra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian tundra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at tundra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at siberian permafrost)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at siberian permafrost)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at siberian tundra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at alaskan tundra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at ice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at tundra)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at siberian ice)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at siberian tundra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at alaskan tundra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at tundra)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at glacier)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze arctic tundra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at tundra)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at siberian tundra)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze glacier)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at alaskan tundra)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at siberian permafrost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at glacial ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mammoth, be at glacial ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at glacial ice)