mammoth: be at great outdoors

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at great outdoors 1.00
be good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at great outdoors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(animal, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(animal, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at great outdoors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at great outdoors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at great outdoors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at great outdoors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(mammoth, be at great outdoors)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)