mammoth: be at grind in siberia

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grind in siberia 1.00
be at grind 0.99
lift log from grind 0.84
be at grind in alaska 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(elephant, lift log from grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(elephant, lift log from grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(elephant, lift log from grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at grind in siberia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at grind)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at grind)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at grind)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in alaska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in siberia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at grind in siberia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at grind in siberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(elephant, lift log from grind)