mammoth: has physical part tusks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, beast
Weight: 0.48
, giant
Weight: 0.48
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, leviathan
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, sea lion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tusks 1.00
have long tusks 0.96
have curved tusks 0.91
has physical part horns 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mammoth, has physical part tusks)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, have long tusks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, have curved tusks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mammoth, have curved tusks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mammoth, have long tusks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammoth, has physical part horns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mammoth, have curved tusks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part horns)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mammoth, have curved tusks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mammoth, have long tusks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mammoth, has physical part horns)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mammoth, has physical part horns)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mammoth, have long tusks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part tusks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mammoth, has physical part tusks)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mammoth, has physical part tusks)