man: be at car

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at car 1.00
drive car 0.90
own car 0.89
start car 0.89
buy car 0.88
be service car 0.86
be wash car 0.85
wash car 0.85
be at truck 0.84
be wash his car 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(woman, drive car)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(man, be at car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(woman, drive car)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(woman, drive car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(woman, drive car)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(man, be at car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(man, be at car)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(man, drive car)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(man, drive car)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(man, be wash car)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(man, be wash car)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(man, be wash his car)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(man, be wash his car)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(man, start car)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(man, own car)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(man, own car)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(man, start car)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(man, own car)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(man, drive car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(man, start car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(man, be wash car)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(man, own car)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(man, start car)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(man, be wash his car)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(man, drive car)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(man, be wash car)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(man, be wash his car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(man, be at car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(man, be at car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(woman, drive car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(man, be at car)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(woman, drive car)