man: be in panties

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in panties 1.00
be in gym knickers 0.82
has pants 0.81
has underwear ride up 0.81
sniff womens underwear 0.80
be attracted to pantyhose 0.80
prefer tight underwear 0.79
have semen stains on spandex 0.78
love sexy lingerie 0.78
love lingerie 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in panties) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(man, be in panties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(man, be in panties) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in panties) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, be in panties)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in panties) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in panties)