man: be walk in mountain

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be walk in mountain 1.00
walk beach 0.81
be walk along beach 0.80
walk up street 0.79
walk down street 0.79
has walk on moon 0.79
walk across street 0.78
storm hill 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(woman, walk up street)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(woman, walk down street)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(soldier, storm hill)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(woman, walk down street)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(soldier, storm hill)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(woman, walk up street)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(woman, walk up street)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(woman, walk down street)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(soldier, storm hill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(woman, walk up street)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(woman, walk down street)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(soldier, storm hill)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(man, be walk in mountain)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(man, has walk on moon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(man, has walk on moon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, has walk on moon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(man, has walk on moon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(man, be walk in mountain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woman, walk up street)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soldier, storm hill)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(woman, walk down street)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woman, walk up street)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(woman, walk down street)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(man, be walk in mountain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soldier, storm hill)