man: think critically

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
think critically 1.00
think 0.78
think about future 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(woman, think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(man, think critically)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(woman, think)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(woman, think)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(woman, think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(man, think critically)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(man, think critically)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(man, think)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(man, think)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(man, think)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(man, think)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(man, think critically)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(man, think critically)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(woman, think)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(man, think critically) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(woman, think)