management: be important in company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in company 1.00
has state company 0.88
be important in business 0.85
be concerned about company 's wacc 0.83
be important to business management 0.80
be important 40 0.77
be used in industry 0.77
is profitable 0.76
be made in industry 0.76
be important in organization 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(solution, be made in industry)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(solution, be used in industry)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(solution, be used in industry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(solution, be made in industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(solution, be made in industry)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solution, be used in industry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(solution, be used in industry)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(solution, be made in industry)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(management, be important in company)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(management, has state company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(management, has state company)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(management, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(management, be important to business management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in organization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, be important to business management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(management, has state company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(management, be important to business management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(management, be important in organization)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(management, has state company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(management, be important in organization)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(management, be important in organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(management, be important in company)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)