management: be important in company

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in company	1.00
has state company	0.88
be important in business	0.85
be concerned about company 's wacc	0.83
be important to business management	0.80
be important 40	0.77
be used in industry	0.77
is profitable	0.76
be made in industry	0.76
be important in organization	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(solution, be made in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(solution, be used in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(solution, be used in industry)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(solution, be made in industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(solution, be made in industry)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(solution, be used in industry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(solution, be used in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(solution, be made in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(management, be important in company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(management, be important in company)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(management, has state company)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(management, has state company)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in business)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(management, be important in business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(management, be important to business management)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in organization)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(management, be important to business management)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(management, has state company)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(management, be important in business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(management, be important to business management)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(management, be important in organization)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in business)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(management, has state company)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(management, be concerned about company 's wacc)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(management, be important in organization)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(management, be important in organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(management, be important in company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(management, be important in company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)