management: be in italy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in italy 1.00
be successful in italy 0.94
be successful in northern italy 0.89
dallas tx 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(management, be in italy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(management, be in italy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in italy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(storage, dallas tx)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(management, be in italy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(management, be in italy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(storage, dallas tx)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(storage, dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(management, be in italy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(management, be in italy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in italy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in northern italy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(storage, dallas tx)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in italy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(management, be in italy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in northern italy)