management: be more important than leadership

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than leadership 1.00
be important in organization 0.77
be better than ethereum 0.77
be important to organization 0.76
be critical to success of organization 0.76
be significant for us 0.76
be important for us 0.76
be important for country 0.76
be important 40 0.76
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(industry, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(industry, be important for country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(industry, be significant for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for country)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(neo, be better than ethereum)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(industry, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(industry, be important for country)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(neo, be better than ethereum)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neo, be better than ethereum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(management, be more important than leadership)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, be critical to success of organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(management, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(management, be important to organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(management, be important in organization)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(management, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(management, be critical to success of organization)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(management, be important to organization)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(management, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(management, be important to organization)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(management, be important in organization)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(management, be critical to success of organization)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(management, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(management, be important in organization)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, be critical to success of organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be more important than leadership)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(neo, be better than ethereum)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(management, be more important than leadership)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)