management: be poor on android

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor on android 1.00
be full on android 0.90
mean on iphone 0.77
be on iphone 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(storage, be full on android)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(storage, mean on iphone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(storage, be on iphone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(storage, be full on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(storage, be full on android)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(storage, mean on iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(storage, mean on iphone)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(storage, be on iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(storage, be on iphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(management, be poor on android)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(management, be poor on android)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(storage, be full on android)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(storage, mean on iphone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(management, be poor on android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(storage, be on iphone)