management: be regarded as science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as science 1.00
be considered as science 0.96
be considered science 0.92
be regarded as profession 0.85
be important in science 0.84
be in science 0.84
be important to science 0.84
is science 0.83
be considered as art 0.82
be called science subject 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(solution, be in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(solution, be in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(solution, be in science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(solution, be in science)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as profession)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(management, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(management, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(management, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(management, be regarded as profession)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as profession)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as profession)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(management, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(management, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(management, be considered as art)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(management, be called science subject)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(management, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(management, be considered as art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as art)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(solution, be in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(solution, be in science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(management, be regarded as science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)