manager: analyze financial statements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
analyze financial statements 1.00
analyze statements 0.96
need accounting information 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(employee, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, need accounting information)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(employee, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(owner, need accounting information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manager, analyze financial statements)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(manager, analyze statements)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(manager, analyze statements)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(manager, analyze statements)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze statements)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(manager, need accounting information)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(manager, need accounting information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(manager, need accounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manager, need accounting information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(owner, need accounting information)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(manager, analyze financial statements)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)