manager: be at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk 1.00
sit at desk 0.92
sit behind reception desk 0.81
be at office room 0.80
be at office 0.78
be at drawer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(boss, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(boss, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tool, be at office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(employee, be at office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be at drawer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(boss, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at desk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at drawer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at office)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office worker, be at office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(boss, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(receptionist, be at desk)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office worker, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(office worker, be at office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(manager, be at desk)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(manager, be at desk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(manager, be at office room)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boss, be at desk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, be at office)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(receptionist, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office worker, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boss, be at desk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, be at office)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(manager, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, be at drawer)