manager: be at office room

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office room 1.00
be at office 0.90
be at board room 0.81
be at desk 0.80
be at basement 0.78
sit at desk 0.77
be vote into office 0.76
sit behind reception desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(boss, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tool, be at office)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(employee, be at office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(boss, be at desk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tool, be at basement)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(boss, be at office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at office)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at basement)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(president, be vote into office)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(president, be at board room)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office worker, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(boss, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(president, be at board room)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(president, be at board room)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(president, be vote into office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(president, be vote into office)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office worker, be at office)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(office worker, be at office)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(receptionist, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(manager, be at office room)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(manager, be at desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(manager, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, be at office)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boss, be at desk)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(office worker, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(president, be at board room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(receptionist, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(president, be vote into office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, be at office)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boss, be at desk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)